Lance Foster (hengruh) wrote,
Lance Foster
hengruh

More on Truth and Science and Spirits and Narratives

There is nothing wrong with speculation or. as you say, "building a story around these data." Best guesses, aka speculation, are inductive reasoning. It is where anyone STARTS, whether the most determined conspiracy theorist, pseudoarchaeologist, pseudohistorian, wizard, tweedy professor, scientist, or debunking hardcore skeptic who would have you prove the sky above is is indeed blue. EVERYONE starts with a favored narrative, a story formed around data, arrived at through inductive reasoning.

The difference is THEN, if one wants to validate that story and find whether or not it is empirically valid (notice I stayed away from "truth" which is philosophical), one must go to deductive reasoning. What is the evidence, how does one analyze the evidence, and construct the multiple working hypotheses which must each be falsifiable (thus the process of "deducting" each hypothesis that are determined to be false, contrary to fact).

Constructing a narrative can come from dreams, novels, fantasies, urban legends, twice-told tales, observations in nature, rumor, or pretty much anything.

BUT, if it is important to determine the reliability, the "truth" if you will, of a claim or a narrative or a "fact," then deductive reasoning, and the scientific method for testing claims of empirical reality, are the best (some would say only) tools for testing those claims and narratives.

If one dislikes deductive reasoning or scientific methodology, because it destroys or infringes upon one's favored narrative (it ruins things), whether it is of a house being haunted, or pyramids being built by aliens, or the Chinese discovering America, that God created everything 6000 years ago, or whatever...then enjoy your favored narrative, find meaning and satisfaction in it, but do not confuse it with verifiable, consensus reality...what most folks know as "the truth."

And yes, this is coming from a fellow who CHOOSES to believe in God, and who has had personal experiences of genius loci and other nature spirits. But I do not pretend to say they are scientifically verifiable :-)
Tags: philosophy, science, spirits
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments